<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organizing Information Is Finite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.duarte.com/2008/08/organizing-information-is-finite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/08/organizing-information-is-finite/</link>
	<description>Duarte Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:19:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Donlan</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/08/organizing-information-is-finite/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Donlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=466#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I am in the middle of writing a new presentation.  I&#039;ll have a chance to practice it.  Thanks for the ideas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in the middle of writing a new presentation.  I&#8217;ll have a chance to practice it.  Thanks for the ideas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Tesch</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/08/organizing-information-is-finite/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Tesch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=466#comment-64</guid>
		<description>as the photographer, i can tell you those reflections are 100% real. although the photoshop gurus in our office would make quick work of it if it weren&#039;t. :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as the photographer, i can tell you those reflections are 100% real. although the photoshop gurus in our office would make quick work of it if it weren&#8217;t. <img src='http://blog.duarte.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/08/organizing-information-is-finite/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=466#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Author and metathinker Nathan Shedroff decided to one up his mentor Wurman by claiming information was organized in *seven* ways, not merely five (http://www.nathan.com/thoughts/unified/6.html): alphabets, locations, time, continuum, numbers, categories, and randomness. (Shedroff kept L, A, T, C, but expanded on H with &#039;continuum,&#039; &#039;numbers,&#039; and &#039;randomness.&#039;) One might argue that continuum actually *is* hierarchy, since he says that a continuum measures a value scale, or the relativity of value X to value Y.

Where Shedroff&#039;s taxonomy kind of breaks down for me is in 1) numbers and 2) randomness. &#039;Numbers&#039; seems hierarchical, even categorical, but does it really need its own space in the taxonomy? And &#039;randomness&#039;? Really? That seems like a copout to me; why not add &#039;miscellaneous&#039; to Wurman and get it over with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author and metathinker Nathan Shedroff decided to one up his mentor Wurman by claiming information was organized in *seven* ways, not merely five (<a href="http://www.nathan.com/thoughts/unified/6.html)" rel="nofollow">http://www.nathan.com/thoughts/unified/6.html)</a>: alphabets, locations, time, continuum, numbers, categories, and randomness. (Shedroff kept L, A, T, C, but expanded on H with &#8216;continuum,&#8217; &#8216;numbers,&#8217; and &#8216;randomness.&#8217;) One might argue that continuum actually *is* hierarchy, since he says that a continuum measures a value scale, or the relativity of value X to value Y.</p>
<p>Where Shedroff&#8217;s taxonomy kind of breaks down for me is in 1) numbers and 2) randomness. &#8216;Numbers&#8217; seems hierarchical, even categorical, but does it really need its own space in the taxonomy? And &#8216;randomness&#8217;? Really? That seems like a copout to me; why not add &#8216;miscellaneous&#8217; to Wurman and get it over with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lertad</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/08/organizing-information-is-finite/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Lertad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=466#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I think that since the human brain thinks and interprets information in patterns, categorizing information in groups in a system such as LATCH really gives a refreshing feeling.  This looks like a very useful tool to begin interpreting information in different ways.  Thanks a lot!

I&#039;m curious, do you also find Tufte&#039;s work inspirating?  (http://snipurl.com/3i3jr)

Also, is that a real reflection on a surface, or is it photoshop? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that since the human brain thinks and interprets information in patterns, categorizing information in groups in a system such as LATCH really gives a refreshing feeling.  This looks like a very useful tool to begin interpreting information in different ways.  Thanks a lot!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, do you also find Tufte&#8217;s work inspirating?  (<a href="http://snipurl.com/3i3jr" rel="nofollow">http://snipurl.com/3i3jr</a>)</p>
<p>Also, is that a real reflection on a surface, or is it photoshop? <img src='http://blog.duarte.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wagner</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/08/organizing-information-is-finite/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=466#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Really helpful post. A new title for me to explore and a practical way to approach organizing information.

Keep creating...a story worth repeating,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really helpful post. A new title for me to explore and a practical way to approach organizing information.</p>
<p>Keep creating&#8230;a story worth repeating,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric Bretschneider</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/08/organizing-information-is-finite/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric Bretschneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=466#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  Information Anxiety was probably the first design book that really got to me - old but still pulled down from my shelf every now and then. Thanks for these useful, fun, and lovely examples!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  Information Anxiety was probably the first design book that really got to me &#8211; old but still pulled down from my shelf every now and then. Thanks for these useful, fun, and lovely examples!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
