<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You’ve Got to be Believed to be Heard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.duarte.com/2008/10/youve-got-to-be-believed-to-be-heard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/10/youve-got-to-be-believed-to-be-heard/</link>
	<description>Duarte Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:09:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/10/youve-got-to-be-believed-to-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=1127#comment-390</guid>
		<description>I too called my wife to see if I was seeing things. It looked like you were bored. That you were almost forced to speak on video. And I didn&#039;t see any smiles. 

What you need to know is that the video didn&#039;t influence my purchase of the book. I still went ahead and bought it, despite the video. The testimonials, reviews and other information on the page was enough to sidestep the video. But I have to say that video could do with some improvement.

And there&#039;s another thing. The sound was &#039;echoey&#039; as if spoken into a direct microphone on the computer, instead of routed through a microphone. I&#039;d recommend a lavalier mic, or to record the audio separately on an audio layer and merge the audio and video later.

Sean
http://www.psychotactics.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too called my wife to see if I was seeing things. It looked like you were bored. That you were almost forced to speak on video. And I didn&#8217;t see any smiles. </p>
<p>What you need to know is that the video didn&#8217;t influence my purchase of the book. I still went ahead and bought it, despite the video. The testimonials, reviews and other information on the page was enough to sidestep the video. But I have to say that video could do with some improvement.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s another thing. The sound was &#8216;echoey&#8217; as if spoken into a direct microphone on the computer, instead of routed through a microphone. I&#8217;d recommend a lavalier mic, or to record the audio separately on an audio layer and merge the audio and video later.</p>
<p>Sean<br />
<a href="http://www.psychotactics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.psychotactics.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Duarte</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/10/youve-got-to-be-believed-to-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Duarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=1127#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Yeah, pretty cold and aloof. I&#039;m not sure why I kept looking off-camera. I think it&#039;s &#039;cuz it was one of the first times I&#039;ve been alone with an audience of one lens and it felt awkward. I learned a ton! 

Rikk, Bert&#039;s book has 2 pages on eye contact. It&#039;s not the thrust of the book, it was what I needed though. I doubt if there is a comprehensive book on eye contact. What I liked about Bert&#039;s insight is that the eyes are part of the central nervous system. It&#039;s the only way our central nervous systems can touch another person. That had so much insight to me as to the power that the eyes have to connect and create a first impression. I&#039;m working hard at my slow blink and also to not move my eyes around like Thomas the Tank Engine.

Enjoy your day guys!
Nancy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, pretty cold and aloof. I&#8217;m not sure why I kept looking off-camera. I think it&#8217;s &#8216;cuz it was one of the first times I&#8217;ve been alone with an audience of one lens and it felt awkward. I learned a ton! </p>
<p>Rikk, Bert&#8217;s book has 2 pages on eye contact. It&#8217;s not the thrust of the book, it was what I needed though. I doubt if there is a comprehensive book on eye contact. What I liked about Bert&#8217;s insight is that the eyes are part of the central nervous system. It&#8217;s the only way our central nervous systems can touch another person. That had so much insight to me as to the power that the eyes have to connect and create a first impression. I&#8217;m working hard at my slow blink and also to not move my eyes around like Thomas the Tank Engine.</p>
<p>Enjoy your day guys!<br />
Nancy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Barnett</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/10/youve-got-to-be-believed-to-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=1127#comment-344</guid>
		<description>On viewing the 1st video I experienced &quot;cognitive dissonance&quot; - I felt positive toward you and your design wisdom but &quot;the you&quot; in the video was alien! For me there was a cold shrewdness - maybe the eyes contributed to it in a subtle manner. It was a good move to do movie two and its one great book of design wisdom! Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On viewing the 1st video I experienced &#8220;cognitive dissonance&#8221; &#8211; I felt positive toward you and your design wisdom but &#8220;the you&#8221; in the video was alien! For me there was a cold shrewdness &#8211; maybe the eyes contributed to it in a subtle manner. It was a good move to do movie two and its one great book of design wisdom! Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/10/youve-got-to-be-believed-to-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=1127#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Nancy,

this seems to be one of the cases where we learn to listen much more to our kids than we usually do ;-)

When watching the first video, from my perspective you really make an impression of being bored. In the second video you appear to be much more behind the story you are telling. Still, there is one thing that I personally find a bit distracting. Every now and then, you are looking to lower right (or lower left from your perspective) corner as if you were reading from a teleprompter.

Christian

PS: The video didn&#039;t sop me from buying the book - and I love it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy,</p>
<p>this seems to be one of the cases where we learn to listen much more to our kids than we usually do <img src='http://blog.duarte.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When watching the first video, from my perspective you really make an impression of being bored. In the second video you appear to be much more behind the story you are telling. Still, there is one thing that I personally find a bit distracting. Every now and then, you are looking to lower right (or lower left from your perspective) corner as if you were reading from a teleprompter.</p>
<p>Christian</p>
<p>PS: The video didn&#8217;t sop me from buying the book &#8211; and I love it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rikk Flohr</title>
		<link>http://blog.duarte.com/2008/10/youve-got-to-be-believed-to-be-heard/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Rikk Flohr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slideology.com/?p=1127#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Nancy, 
Would you consider Bert Decker’s book to be a good training for eye-contact techniques? Are there other books more on point and more in-depth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy,<br />
Would you consider Bert Decker’s book to be a good training for eye-contact techniques? Are there other books more on point and more in-depth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
