TOPICS
TWITTER UPDATES
WEDNESDAY APRIL 22, 2009

Audience on the Stage

Last month Nancy Duarte spoke at Web2.0 Expo and it was a huge success.

In preparation for her talk she asked me if there would be a way to reproduce an exercise called “Speaker & Audience Mapping” that she usually leads in the slideology workshops. The exercise goes like this: the audience picks one of a dozen different audience types (eg. Oakland Raider Fans, Trekkies, Girl Scouts, PETA). Then Nancy asks the entire group to shout out responses to several questions. I’ve picked three of them demonstrate the concept:

  1. What are they like?
  2. What do you want them to do?
  3. How might they resist?

Now, we expected a large crowd (we had over 200 attend this workshop) and we knew that asking a large audience to shout out ideas in a giant Moscone hall just wouldn’t work. So what Nancy needed was a way to collect these ideas from the masses, but also have instantaneous feedback so ideas could spread and evolve. Naturally, we began to use the very same exercise to find a solution for how to teach it. We made some generalizations about our audience, and it went something like this:

Web 2.0 Expo Attendees

  • What are they like?
    Technical, educated and hungry to learn. They are connected people. Obsessed with Web 2.0 technology
  • What do you want them to do?
    To share their ideas with Nancy in a live interactive way
  • How might they resist?
    Barriers to entry: login, signup, etc.. Biases against different mobile platforms. Privacy issues

Finding Solutions: Twitter

I realized quickly that there were some things I could assume about the audience. If they are at a Web 2.0 Conference they are probably attached to a laptop or mobile device of some sort. I also assumed that most of the attendees were probably active tweeters. I looked into the new craze around hashtags and my first impression was that it would be the perfect solution for us. The behavior would work like this:

  1. Nancy asks the users to tweet their ideas and add the #slideology hash tag
  2. The audience complies and begins posting their ideas as tweets
  3. hashtags.org or search.twitter.com collects the tweets into a list

I tested this method, but to my dismay it took around 15 minutes for either search site to register my test tweet. This was a huge problem. We needed this solution to be instantaneous and live. After thinking about it longer, more issues came to the surface. A tweet is a tweet–no matter how it’s tagged. A tagged tweet still shows up in your twitter feed for all to see. We wanted our audience to go wild with ideas… barking out whatever came to their mind–stuff that might not be appropriate for their highly esteemed twitter feed. A tweet such as “trekkies are nerds #slideology” might offend a few of their followers–definitely an issue for people who value the integrity of their tweets. One of my objectives was to reduce resistance from the audience and this method had too many potential road blocks.

SMS Polls

I looked into the popular new method of SMS polling ,and I found some really promising stuff. I discovered that there are companies like Poll Everywhere that have systems tailored specifically for the use of polling during a presentation. To get an idea of how successful this is think–American Idol. It works like this:

  1. You ask the audience to send a text message to 41411
  2. Audience member sends a text message: “CAST 1008″
  3. Poll Everywhere collects the answers in real time
  4. You show a PowerPoint slide that dynamically charts responses

The pricing at Poll Everywhere is determined by the number of responses you are expecting. The “Presenter” plan accepts 250 text messages per poll and costs $65/month. All Poll Everywhere plans give you unlimited polls. This is an elegant solution, but for Nancy’s exercise she needed an open ended stream of ideas–not a multiple choice poll.

Chat Room

Everybody is familiar with chat rooms because they have been around for what seems like forever. The established comfort level meant there would be less resistance from the audience. In a way, Twitter really emulates a lot of the behaviors of the classic chat room, except in a more asynchronous way. What the chat room afforded us was a live, synchronous discussion that could also be displayed on Nancy’s screen in front of the entire audience.

I discovered that Meebo offers a service where you can create and customize your own chat room. These rooms were completely free (with the occasional advertisement) and they don’t require any signup or registration from the guests. Since (nearly) everyone at this conference would have a laptop–or a smart phone–they could load this chat room and join the discussion right where they were sitting. Additionally, attendees could join as “guest” so that privacy would not be an point of resistance.

I decided to use the chat room because it was easy to setup and post to our website. Meebo is free and there were no limits on the number of responses from the audience. I posted the Meebo room to our website and Nancy integrated it into her exercise. It worked just as expected–lots of people opened up their laptops to jump into the discussion. Not one person felt compelled to yell their idea across the lecture hall–evidence that they felt like their voices were heard through this alternative medium.

Conclusion

While Twitter has all the buzz and charisma, it fell short of our needs for something fast and engaging. Using SMS polling is an exceptional choice for polling an audience of any size. A chat room works great if your audience is sitting in front of a laptop or some other connected device.

I challenge you to re-think the way that you interact with your audience. Is it really so crazy to ask them to participate in your presentation? Can you use their feedback to modify and fine-tune the course of your message? Will a group exercise bring them back from the brink of boredom? There are audiences out there that will LOVE this kind of two way discussion, and there are some audiences with whom polling would be a complete flop. That is why it’s absolutely important that you really know your audience before you get up on that stage.

What does your experience say?

Have you ever participated in a live poll during a presentation? What was your experience like? Is this something you would do in one of your presentations?

Back to Top

Topic: Event, Strategy, Technology
Tags: , , , , ,

  • COMMENTS (13)

Brian Asmussen

April 22nd, 2009
10:58 pm

I think this is a great idea. I used something similar in my college marketing class. As part of the curriculum we were required to purchase a $30 devise that was registered to our SS#. This devise would do two things: 1) take our attendance and 2) “vote” for different multiple choice questions posed by the presenter and tallied live for the class to see on the screen. I think we have to have feedback from the audience regardless of size. If SMS text message allowed for full text instead of a multiple choice number the issue could be solved!

Alessandra

April 23rd, 2009
12:02 am

if no technology is available, how does the “speaker and audience mapping” process proceed?

Travis Dahle

April 23rd, 2009
5:01 am

Interesting article. I was surprised that it took so long for hastags and search.twitter to find your posts. I wonder if that was something that can be fixed? However, I think you also pointed out a good point that people who are very protective of their tweets might not be as willing to post any thought that comes to their head when at a conference. It’s an interesting problem and would be interested to hear from anyone who has used twitter.

Cameron Nouri

April 23rd, 2009
5:41 am

At SxSW twitter was the best thing possible using hashtags — And I loved using twitterfall.com to keep up with the discussions. It worked beautifully for me. Speed didn’t seem to be a problem — it seemed instantaneous.

I do think the chat room is a good idea, but its not truly a public conversation. That is the one benefit of using Twitter is that your discussion can grow to reach more and more people through the network effect.

Carolyn

April 23rd, 2009
4:13 pm

For the special remote PresentationCamp session, it took some time for the first-ever use of #prescampo to post. After that, it was instantaneous. Olivia wrote about this under point #2:

http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/audience/twitter-participation-presentation/

So you should be able to use #slideology next time without a problem (although I would suggest a shorter tag, since people are typing rather quickly)

Miguel Cavalcanti

April 23rd, 2009
5:53 pm

The Meebo idea was great. I was there and really enjoyed the workshop. Also, I learned a lot, and afterwards, gor Nancy´s book. Tks, Miguel, from Brazil

Tony Ramos

April 24th, 2009
4:50 am

Two recent tweets about tools that bring audience tweets to the presentation screen:
http://twitter.com/BertDecker/statuses/1452443086
http://twitter.com/tonyramos/statuses/1504920981
Have not fully tested either app’s capabilities, but it’s clear that this is the direction we are all headed.

Rob

April 24th, 2009
5:24 am

This is a great run-down of your objectives and process for finding a solution. How did Nancy then manage all of this audience participation during her speech? It is hard enough to deliver the prepared material, but then to review the chat channel, summarize the important points and address them on the fly – that’s super human! Was there someone assisting Nancy with the chat channel and feeding her highlights?

Derek Bruff

April 24th, 2009
10:21 am

The use of “clickers” like Brian describes in the first comment above is gaining a lot of traction in the higher ed and K12 environments. There are many different and very effective ways to use even multiple-choice questions to engage students in learning during class and to gather feedback from them–questions about concepts, applications, critical thinking, or student opinions.

Using free-response questions for audience / student feedback is trickier for reasons pointed out here. What technology works well to allow participants to respond easily and quickly? And how can a presenter / instructor quickly make sense of and use feedback from participants?

As it turns out, Poll Everywhere does allow for free-text responses, so that might have been an option after all. The service (and others like it) is being used more and more in presentations, classroom, and even churches.

Finding ways to leverage free-response feedback during a presentation is an open question. One very good solution for short answers (1-3 words) is to generate a word cloud of responses on the fly. I’ve blogged some thoughts about this challenge and other ideas for using mobile devices in presentations and classrooms:

http://derekbruff.com/teachingwithcrs/?cat=13

A couple of years ago, before Twitter, Facebook and SMS, I use a special device in a presentation I was giving. A kind of remote control. The attendees used it to vote. It was not possible to express idea, it was just a voting machine. It Worked well and we had real time results, stats, bar graph, etc. Are those functionality possible with meebo or with a Twitter solution? Or it is only available with SMS Polls?

Nancy Duarte

May 9th, 2009
8:36 am

You were probably using an expensive Audience Response System. Those are amazing to use but are strictly for polling vs submitting ideas and words.

Nancy Duarte

May 9th, 2009
8:39 am

We used it to brainstorm ideas so the chat window so as unique ideas popped up, I’d say them outloud as the entire audience read the chat. It actually had a memorable impact. We’ll be using a similar technique with the WebEx chat function for our webinars.

LisaStratus

June 14th, 2009
3:59 am

I congratulate, the remarkable answer…

  • SUBMIT A COMMENT






© 2009 Duarte Design, Inc.  • Privacy Policy  • comments@duarte.com  • Log out