We recently completed a high-profile product launch presentation for a client. (No, it wasn’t the video above, but very similar!) When I reviewed my notes after the product launch, I discovered some important lessons about committee-wrangling.
Near the end of our three-month engagement, the launch date looming closer, I felt anxious about the flurry of changes we were making to the presentation. We worked with a committee that seemed to sprout new members every week, and each change (coupled with fast turnarounds) made me nervous that we were getting away from the essence of the presentation. As the content lead on the project, I felt responsible for the finished story, but I also felt pulled in ten different directions by the ever-shifting moods of the committee.
Despite my worries, though, the presentation was a hit. Press coverage, bloggers, even the committee itself – everybody loved the end result. And though I was glad we had succeeded, I puzzled over how we managed to hold together a coherent story throughout the months-long process.
Later, as I was archiving my files and sorting through all fifteen versions of the script, I noticed an early version of a slidemap we created for the client near the beginning of the project. It was a high-level map of the presentation; just a skeleton, really. But, to my surprise, it mapped perfectly to the final presentation.
How could it be, that despite dozens of revisions and weeks of going back and forth on different sections, that we ended up with the same presentation we had envisioned in the beginning?
Though I wasn’t conscious of it at the time, my team and I were displaying one of the more subtle skills in the designer’s toolkit: committee wrangling. And now that I am conscious of it, I thought I would post a few tips on the subject:
Committees are an unfortunate fact of life for designers. The only way to avoid them is to make presentations for yourself and no one else. But if you’d like to get paid for what you do, you’ll need to learn to handle multiple decision-makers, multiple opinions, and multiple revisions. So you might as well embrace it and have some fun with it.
Yes, you might get into some battles. But battles aren’t the same thing as disagreements. Learn to tell the difference. If your client makes a suggestion you disagree with, feel free to push back a little, but if they push back, too, it’s time for you to make a choice. Is this disagreement important enough for a battle? If not, let it go. If so, help them understand why. Either way, remember that they have as much at stake as you do.
Garth Brooks, in one of his songs, says, “…it’s really kind of simple, keep your mind in the middle, while your butt spins round and round.” Garth is talking about riding a bull, but I think it applies here, too. No matter what happens throughout the process, keep your focus on the essence of the story. Stay faithful to the big idea, the 10-second version of the presentation, and no matter how many revision cycles you endure, the presentation will turn out okay. Committee wrangling is hardest when we get caught up in little things and forget to watch the big things. Then, later down the road, we find that we’ve somehow lost the essence of our story and we need to do another revision to find it again.
Now that the dust has settled, I can look back on our committee-wrangling experience and realize that we did pretty well on all three of these points, so despite my worry and frustration throughout the process, we still made good choices along the way and eventually brought the whole committee along with us.
May your next committee experience be a good one.
Topic: Delivery
Tags: Client, Committee, presentation, Vision, Writing
Interesting site, but much advertisments on him. Shall read as subscription, rss.
Thanks, good article.
Nice Tip. When a presenter goes outside their in-house presentation resources, they realize they have a problem and need help with something they feel incapable of handling on their own.
Any tips for dealing with in-house clients that insist on bringing you their finished presentations and asking you to jazz it up or make it sexy. I still have the deadline pressures and ever increasing last minute contributors that will take a well designed slide(s) and make it look like an idea they borrowed from another presentation and stretched it to fit into theirs; or molded it to have multiple meanings.
I have thought of conducting mini seminars to help educate them on the need for slidemapping and including the benefits of involving their designers up front. But most are executives and or under time constraints that just don’t include sitting down with a lowly presentation specialist. Except to say, “I need this by c.o.b.”
Pretty cool post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say
that I have really liked reading your blog posts. Anyway
I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!
© 2010 Duarte Design, Inc. • Privacy Policy • comments@duarte.com • Log out
Jes
May 26th, 2009
2:22 pm
In my experience, the committee expands in proportion to the importance/profile of the presentation. So if you’re dealing with a large committee with fervently voiced opinions, it’s a good bet that they don’t have “as much at stake as you do”. Rather, they have vastly more at stake than you do, and they’re feeling the pressure.