TOPICS
TWITTER UPDATES
THURSDAY OCTOBER 1, 2009

Stanford Passed (and Failed) the Glance Test. Would you?

A couple weeks ago Jennifer Aaker brought me in to speak to her “How to Tell a Story” class at the Stanford’s Graduate School of Business. By the time I showed up, the students already been through the process of identifying a personal story that has professional relevance and then they brought me in for two hours to train on transforming the stories visually.

One of the tools we used was our Glance Test. This test was co-created with Glenn Hughes over at KLA Tencor. In slide:ology I state that slides should be processed in 3 seconds or less. It’s impossible for people to process your slides and your words simultaneously. The test gives you a quantifiable way to test a slide’s viability as a glance medium by calculating a signal-to-noise ratio for individual slides.

GlanceTest_card

Click to download PDF of the Glance Test

If you have a longer presentation, try the Glance Test for 5 slides on a page.

The students each submitted a 4-slide story. Duarte filled out a glance test for each one. By using this process, most of the subjectivity is removed but here’s how they faired:

Storyboard 1:

Even though these slides are more simple than most corporate presentations, they still didn’t pass the test. The placement of images was random and the images themselves didn’t work together as a system—where they all seem related in some way. There was too much text on each slide which took longer than 3 seconds to process. What this student did do well is on the first two slides they created a sense of flow using arrows and placement to guide the eye.

Storyboard 2:

I actually adored this presentation. It’s better to make simple crude drawings of your concept than to muddy it up with random meaningless images. I could identify the concept right away from the images. The illustrations were all uniform, there was no clutter, they have a color system (albeit a simple one), flow, low text. This one got 2 thumbs up from me.

Ideally all your slides will have zero noise. I realize though that in organizations that can be impossible. Set a goal for your department or organization and use this tool to hold the troops accountable.

Back to Top

Topic: Design, Question
Tags: , , , , ,

  • COMMENTS (6)

James Wood

October 1st, 2009
9:32 pm

This is a fantastic post. Both a clear explanation of the theory and great application.

I especially appreciate the means to offer an objective analysis of a presentation.

Thanks!

Stephen Hampshire

October 2nd, 2009
12:29 am

A useful checklist, but I don’t trust rules. They turn sensible advice (don’t let your slides fight you for attention) into manacles.

Sometimes it’s okay to have a complex slide, just as sometimes it’s okay to have a chart that takes a bit of explaining.

Kevin Holligan, MEETING MAGIC (UK) Limited

October 2nd, 2009
12:50 am

A great AND TIMELY timely post as I am just about to help a client with their slides, again. (They are pleased with my help so far based around your webinars and book). I can share this checklist with them as part of educating them to do better.
We have reaised that within meetings that we are facilitating (OUR MAIN WORK) it is worth helping on this aspect, een though it’s not our official job, as it helps to better achieve outcomes and increase engagement, something we strive to do!

Magnus Niemann

October 8th, 2009
1:49 am

I like these slides as a starting point for thinking about the quality of my slides.

Nancy, since I am currently doing some heavy evangelization for better presentations at my university (colleagues and students), may I translate these tests into German and present them on my private blog (http://grindblog.de)?

Martha

October 9th, 2009
8:22 pm

Umm…. I don’t get the story in storyboard #2.
Are they supposed to stand on their own?

Conor Neill

October 10th, 2009
12:30 pm

I spent the first 9 years of my professional life working for one of the big consulting firms (Andersen Consulting, then Accenture). I have spent the rest of my working life trying to stop speakers projecting word documents onto screens. I like this test as a practical tool to help presenters focus on the reason they have the slides with them. Thanks.

  • SUBMIT A COMMENT






© 2009 Duarte Design, Inc.  • Privacy Policy  • comments@duarte.com  • Log out